None of these sources are [sic] trustworthySubmitted by Karl Hagen
Q: As an SAT writing instructor, I am intrigued by your Grammar Myths page, which debunks the rule that "none" is always singular. Since the College Board follows this rule, we have thousands of students learning to write sentences like “None of the chickens is hatched.” What do you think about that?
Prescriptive FetishesSubmitted by Karl Hagen
Fowler's dictum holds for many other prescriptive rules of grammar. In many cases, ignorance is bliss. Your writing will probably be better, because you're not twisting yourself into knots trying to avoid some illusory error, and you won't waste your time thinking about other people's grammar when you should be attending to their meaning.
Comma fanboysSubmitted by Karl Hagen
Langue and Lingua FrancaSubmitted by Karl Hagen
There is the illusion that we speak the same language, but we really don't.
Why we need empty categoriesSubmitted by Karl Hagen
I've tried looking this up in every grammar guide I can find, but I haven't found the answer. Consider these two sentences: I bought a car to drive myself to work. I bought an alarm clock to wake me in the morning.
If you still think Strunk & White is a good bookSubmitted by Karl Hagen
Do me a favorSubmitted by Karl Hagen
My Inner Geek RejoicesSubmitted by Karl Hagen
For my birthday, I received Don Ringe's From Proto-Indo-European to Proto-Germanic and I've been reading it while taking the train in to work.
I find that even though I'm not in academia any more it's refreshing to spend some time perusing hard-core historical linguistic geekery, particularly since I've never really delved into PIE with the depth that I should have. I suspect that many Anglo-Saxonists tend to skimp on their study of the linguistic pre-history of English, especially the earliest stages.